Philosophy: Meaning and Language 발음듣기
대기중
Philosophy: Meaning and Language
109문장
100%
베트남어 번역 1명 참여
출처 : 칸아카데미
번역
0%
In particular, we'll focus on ways to explain how some sounds and marks on a page or computer screen have meaning.발음듣기
대기중
For example, what makes the sounds "snow is white" and "mercury" meaningful, while this sound (keys jangling) fails to have meaning?발음듣기
대기중
This could be called a foundational meaning question, since we're looking for what serves as the determiners or foundations of an expression or sentence's meaning.발음듣기
대기중
Questions like "What does 'cat' mean?" or "What does 'gato' mean?" are descriptive meaning questions.발음듣기
대기중
When we ask descriptive meaning questions, we're not asking "What gives the word 'cat' meaning?", but what meaning it actually has.발음듣기
대기중
We'll look at two ways to answer foundational meaning questions, questions about what gives a word or utterance meaning.발음듣기
대기중
There have been two general sorts of answers to this question: internalist answers and externalist answers.발음듣기
대기중
These theories are called "internalist," as the psychological states are inside individual persons, maybe inside individual persons' heads.발음듣기
대기중
Externalists, on the other hand, argue that something outside of the individual is required to determine meaning.발음듣기
대기중
They usually appeal to natural features of the world, or the expertise of others in society.발음듣기
대기중
Grice argued that intentions of a specific sort can account for certain sounds and marks on a page or computer screen being meaningful.발음듣기
대기중
He developed the theory on which a sentence has a particular meaning given a speaker's or writer's intentions.발음듣기
대기중
Remember, here we're concerned with foundational meaning questions, rather than descriptive meaning questions, so we can sidestep questions about what the sentence means and instead focus on how it is that it has meaning.발음듣기
대기중
According to Grice, my utterance of that sentence means "P" just in case I, the speaker or writer, uttered that sentence intending three things.발음듣기
대기중
Second, that my audience recognizes that I want you to come to believe that P, that I had that intention.발음듣기
대기중
And third, that you come to believe "P," given your recognition that I wanted you to come to believe "P."발음듣기
대기중
It tells us what my utterance, the one I made just a minute ago, means based on the intentions I had.발음듣기
대기중
It means "P." It means the same thing that my utterance, "Grice lived in Oxford," meant just a moment ago.발음듣기
대기중
So we might want an account that tells us what that sentence itself eternally, or given every utterance, means.발음듣기
대기중
If speakers tend to use "Grice lived in Oxford" to mean that a particular person resided in some town in England, then that is what it means.발음듣기
대기중
Intentions are goals that are represented psychologically in individuals, so this is an internalist theory.발음듣기
대기중
Next, let's look at how an externalist would answer the question "What makes our words or utterances meaningful?"발음듣기
대기중
The second condition is that the meaning of an expression determines what things the expression applies to.발음듣기
대기중
For example, the meaning of this expression, "creature with a kidney," determines a certain group of things that have kidneys.발음듣기
대기중
You're one of those things, I'm one of those things, my dog is one of those things, and lots of other creatures, every other creature with a kidney.발음듣기
대기중
Any expression with the same meaning as "creature with a kidney" will apply to all those same things.발음듣기
대기중
So for example, "renate" means "creature with a kidney," so "renate" and "creature with a kidney" apply to exactly the same things: you, me, my dog, and so on.발음듣기
대기중
Thought experiments are hypothetical situations that philosophers use to help determine what would make something true and what the conditions for accurately applying a concept are.발음듣기
대기중
They help us to look beyond the way our world really is to consider ways the world might have been.발음듣기
대기중
The most famous thought experiment for externalism focuses on a scenario involving Earth and another planet we could call "Twin Earth."발음듣기
대기중
He's had some to drink, he's swum in it, he's admired it flowing in a river, he thinks of it as something like "the colorless, "odorless, tasteless liquid that fills "the lakes and streams and comes out of the faucet."발음듣기
대기중
Oscar thinks, and sometimes says, things like "water is wet" and "I would love a cold glass of water."발음듣기
대기중
Oscar doesn't think things like "water is H2O," since the chemical structure of water has not yet been discovered.발음듣기
대기중
Twin Oscar would say things that sound like this: "water is wet" and "I would love a cold glass of water."발음듣기
대기중
Both think of wet liquid substances that fill lakes and streams, they say things that sound identical, they report their feelings in ways that sound identical, yet, Putnam argues, they're different.발음듣기
대기중
Oscar says things about water, the H2O stuff, while Twin Oscar has thoughts, and says things, about twin water, the XYZ stuff.발음듣기
대기중
Since they are psychologically identical but mean different things when they make the same sound, "water," meaning cannot be wholly internal.발음듣기
대기중
I think of both as deciduous trees that grow in North America, and I just don't have any more information about them.발음듣기
대기중
Given this, it seems that I am in the same psychological state when thinking "beeches are lovely" and "elms are lovely."발음듣기
대기중
So, if meaning determines what things an expression applies to, and all meaning is is one's psychological state, then for me, "elm" and "beech" pick out the same thing.발음듣기
대기중
But that doesn't seem right. I speak English and I use "elm" and "beech" in the same way as a more informed individual does.발음듣기
대기중
If you're convinced by these examples, we can ask, "What external things are relevant to meaning?"발음듣기
대기중
What kinds of things are out there in one's physical environment affects the meanings of one's words and utterances.발음듣기
대기중
According to the externalist, causal and historical connections with our natural and social environment work to determine what our expressions and utterances mean. Let's sum up.발음듣기
대기중
We saw that the internalists argue that complex speaker intentions that are part of an individual's psychological state determine meaning.발음듣기
대기중
In contrast, externalists argue that some external factors, like one's natural environment, work to determine what our words and sentences mean.발음듣기
대기중
칸아카데미 더보기더 보기
-
65문장 0%번역 좋아요1
번역하기 -
82문장 24%번역 좋아요2
번역하기 -
49문장 0%번역 좋아요2
번역하기 -
The Science of Van Gogh's Bedrooms
55문장 0%번역 좋아요1
번역하기
