Renting vs. Buying (detailed analysis)

194문장 100% 한국어 번역 3명 참여 출처 : 칸아카데미

Renting vs. Buying (detailed analysis)

Welcome. So I've done this series of presentations about housing.

And at least, my thesis on why housing prices might have gone up, and how you should maybe, in simple terms, think about the rent-versus-buy decision.

But one thing that's happened, a lot of people said, oh, Sal, you're making oversimplifying assumptions.

You're assuming interest-only loans.

You're not factoring in the tax deductions of mortgages, et cetera, of interest on your mortgage.

Which I did, but I did make some simplifying assumptions.

So that we could kind of do back of the envelope math, and just think about what the main drivers are when you think about renting versus buying.

But it is fair. That's just kind of a first cut.

You really should do a multi-line model, trying to figure out what could happen to you.

And then tweak your assumptions. And really figure out what's going to happen to you if housing appreciates, depreciates.

If interest rates change. If you put 10% down, or 20% down, or whatever.

So with that in mind, I've constructed this model.

What I called, this is the home purchase model.

And you can download it yourself and play with it.

I think this will prove to be useful for you.

You can download it at khanacademy.org/ downloads/buyrent.xls.

It's an Excel spreadsheet. So if you have Excel, you should be able to access it.

And maybe you want to follow along while you watch this video.

So just khanacademy.org/ downloads/buyrent.xls.

So once you download it, let me explain what I assumed in the model.

So what I did in yellow, both this bright yellow and this less bright yellow, these are our assumptions.

These are the things that are going to drive the model, and tell us whether over - and I calculated over 10 years - whether we will do better renting versus buying.

And so if you download this model and want to play with it yourself, unless you are fairly sophisticated with Excel, the only things you should change are the things in yellow.

Everything else is calculated. And it's driven by these inputs.

So of course, what matters in a home?

Well the purchase price matters. So you just in put it there.

The down payment matters. You could, if you want, you can just write like I wrote, 20% of whatever the purchase price is.

So you can write the exact number, or you can just leave it the way I did.

And whatever the down payment percentage is, it'll calculate it.

This is the interest rate you assume.

This is the principal amortization. So principal amortization just means, well, if I just keep paying this mortgage, after how long is the entire principal amount - not just interest, how long is the entire principal amount going to be paid off in?

So essentially, a 30-year fixed rate loan has a 30 year principal amortization.

If you have a 10-year loan, you'd put 10 here.

This is the property tax rate.

This is what I assume because I live in California, and in most areas of California, that's the property tax.

This is what I assume about annual maintenance.

That's just an assumption. Some houses might be less, might be more.

That's up to you to decide.

This is housing association dues. Maybe if you live in a community that has a shared golf course, or a shared pool or something.

Put it at 0 if you don't.

This is annual insurance, for things like hazard insurance, and flood insurance, earthquake insurance, or whatever insurance you need where you live.

And in this bright yellow, I say, what is the assumed annual appreciation of the house itself?

And this is a huge assumption.

And that's why I put it into this bold yellow color.

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

Or you could say the model is very, very, very sensitive to that assumption.

Here, this is your assumed marginal income tax rate.

And why does that matter? Well because you can deduct the interest that you spend on your mortgage.

And also you can deduct, actually, the property tax.

So if you can deduct $100 in interest and property tax, if your marginal tax rate is 30% - so that means at what rate are you being taxed on every incremental dollar.

If it's 30%, that means a $100 deduction will save you $30.

If your marginal tax rate is 20%, a $100 deduction will save you $20.

So that's where that comes into play.

The 2%, that's general inflation.

And what this assumption drives is, well, there's going to be some inflation on things like housing association dues, annual maintenance, insurance.

And so this, what you assume about, well, what is just the general rate of inflation, in our model that's actually going to drive how these grow over the life of your loan.

And then once you type in all of these things, the monthly mortgage payment is calculated.

I assumed that the interest compounds once a month.

You can, if you know your geometric series, you can go in there and you can tweak it around so it compounds more frequently or less frequently.

But my understanding is that most mortgages compound monthly.

And then this right here, so this is everything that's driving the buying a home decision.

Now these assumptions are so that we can make a comparison to, well, what if instead of using that down payment to buy a house, what if we actually just save that down payment, put it in the bank, and rent a house instead.

So this is cost of renting a similar home.

This is the annual rental price inflation.

And I would argue, to some degree, that rental price inflation over the long term should not be that different than housing price inflation.

Because to some degree, rental is kind of the earnings on a home.

And if earnings increase and the overall asset doesn't increase, your return increases.

Or the other way around. Your return decreases.

But anyway, don't want to get too complicated.

And then this is the 6%, or I just assume it's 6%.

You can change it. This is what you assume that you can get on your cash.

So if I don't put the $150,000 down deposit on the home, and I put it in, I don't know, maybe I'm a good investor.

I could put in the stock market.

Maybe I can get 20% a year.

Or maybe I'm really risk averse, and I put it in government bonds, and I get 4% a year.

So this is the assumption that you get in on that.

And it actually should be an after-tax return on that cash.

So if my tax rate is 30% and I think I can get 10% percent on the stock market, I should actually put a 7% here.

So we want to make sure that we're completely accurate for taxes.

So now let me explain the rest of the model to you.

I want to make sure that I can fit it all within this window.

Let me just squeeze this a little bit.

Excel on YouTube is a new thing for me.

That's not what I wanted to do.

So let me unfreeze the window.

OK. So now I can show you the rest of model.

So all those assumptions that we did, that drives this model.

Let me freeze the window right here.

OK. That should make things a little bit easier.

So this is the buying scenario, up to line 40.

This says, OK, at period zero, what is the home value?

And don't type in anything here.

It's all automatically calculated. So at period zero, what is your home value?

And then it uses essentially the appreciation numbers.

And each period is essentially a month.

I actually wrote that down here.

And then it figures out, what is the market value of your home?

And it's completely driven by that appreciation number.

This right here is the debt, or essentially the principal payment on your mortgage, or how much do you owe to the bank.

And as you see, as months go by, when you pay the mortgage note - and I show that right here, this mortgage payment.

Some amount of that, which is line 33, the principal paid.

Some of that goes to decrease the amount you owe.

And then a lot of it, especially initially, goes to be actually the interest on the amount you owe.

And then obviously, if you watch the video on introduction to balance sheets, your equity in the home is the value of the home minus the debt, or minus what you owe the bank.

So this actually calculates your equity.

Or essentially, one way to view it, is actually to say, well, what am I worth?

Or what is this investment worth to me at that point?

So these are kind of the important numbers in the home buying scenario.

It is driven by - This interest on debt, it's calculated by what interest rate you assume, times the debt you owe and the period before.

The mortgage payment, we calculated that before, using our mathematical knowledge of geometric series.

The paid principal, that's going to be the mortgage payment minus your interest.

Insurance payment, it's on a monthly basis, right?

So we essentially took whatever our annual insurance payment was and we divide it by 12.

But then we grow it by the rate of inflation on a monthly basis.

So we took the inflation rate, divided by 12, and we multiplied by each of these months.

The housing association dues, once again, this is on a monthly basis.

So we just took your assumption, divided by 12.

Maintenance, same thing. Property tax, same thing. Although I assumed that your house gets reassessed.

So you're in a state where every year, or every several years, the assessor comes, says, oh, your house is worth more now, so I'm going to raise your taxes.

That's not the case in a lot of parts of California.

But it's the case in many parts of the U.S. So actually to some degree, this, the dollar value, the property tax is driven by this home value assumption up here.

This income tax saving from interest deduction, this is assuming that at that marginal tax rate, you can deduct the property tax and the interest on the debt.

And then this is the total cash outflow after adding back the income tax savings.

So this is essentially how much cash goes out the door, even after the tax savings, every month, in the buying scenario.

That's what that is. So hopefully that makes a little bit of sense.

So what we want to do is, we want to figure out, OK, you could do that.

You could buy the house, put $150,000 down.

And every month put this much out, and as you see that number grows.

The mortgage is the same, but a lot of these expenses grow with inflation.

But I want to compare that to what happens if I take that exact amount of cash, after adjusting for how much money I get back from taxes.

And if I said, well, I'm going to use that cash to pay my rent and any other expenses associated with renting - which really aren't much - to pay my rent, and then put the rest in the bank.

So what we're saying is, well, that assumption was, that you can rent a similar house for $2,500.

It may be right, it may be wrong.

It's up for you to play with.

And of course it grows with inflation slowly.

Obviously your rent doesn't increase every month, but I assume it does fairly continuously.

It's a reasonable assumption I think.

Although you can change it. You can make it only step up every year.

And then this line down here tells us the savings while renting.

And I'm not saying the savings from, you know, something's on sale so I save money.

But your savings in terms of how much you have in the bank.

So if you rented instead of putting that $150,000 as a down payment, you could have put it in the bank.

So that would be your savings account at period zero.

And then your savings account at period one would be this amount of money and whatever return you got it, plus the difference between your cash out from buying a home and your rent.

So this is your savings. So what I do in this model - and I could show you, I could scroll through multiple periods.

Yeah, this model actually goes as far as Excel would let me.

But the average house - anyone who's traded mortgage bonds will tell you - the average mortgage loan has a 10 year expected life.

Because that's when, on average, people tend to move or refinance.

So what I do is I figure out, well, given your assumptions you can make your own assumptions - given your assumptions, what is your home value?

So let me make sure I can get to that.

So given your assumptions, what this calculates is, well, it tells you what the home value is after 10 years, your debt after 10 years, your home equity after 10 years.

And it assumes you were to sell your house.

Because that's what the average American does after 10 years.

And so what is the transaction cost?

You pay 6% to a broker.

Hopefully that won't be the case in 10 years and the internet will dis-intermediate real estate brokers, but who knows.

I apologize to if you are broker.

And then this line, line 54, that tells you what the net cash is if you sell your house at a market price, you pay the broker.

This number right here is much simpler to some degree.

It just tells you, well let's say you decided not to buy the house.

Given all your assumptions, how much would you have saved in the bank at that time?

And so this number right here, this number is the difference between those two numbers in 10 years, discounted back to today.

Actually I meant to present value it.

But did I present value these numbers?

Oh no, I didn't. So actually this was meant to be the present value.

I'm going to correct that before you actually play with the model.

Right now I just took the 10 year value, so this is the value in year 10.

This is the difference between the two.

The present value would be if you discount this by some discount rate.

Whatever you think, probably the inflation rate.

And it would tell you in today's money, what is the benefit or the advantage of buying versus renting?

Anyway I've spent 14 minutes of your time.

I encourage you to download this model, play with it, and then work out the assumptions.

Because I think that's the important thing.

Some people, they'll make some set of assumptions and say, ah-ha!

I should rent. Or they say, ah-ha!

I should buy. But they don't realize that they made some assumptions.

That although it looks really reasonable, let's say I make this 3% annual appreciation assumption.

That doesn't seem crazy. But it's amazing how much it'll change the model if you make that 3% into a 1%, or if you make it into even a negative 1% or negative 2%.

It's completely possible. It's happened before in the past that you have flat real estate prices for a significant period of time, even 10 years.

And actually most of the studies show that real estate, over the last 100 years, has actually roughly grown, in real terms, maybe 1% or 2%.

So actually 1% or 2% percent here isn't that conservative.

And actually especially after a big real estate boom, may be prudent.

So play with these assumptions. And I think it'll give you an intuition of what are the real drivers.

Another big thing - sometimes you don't rent a similar home.

You'd rent a smaller home. So that would be a different type of savings.

And there are trade-offs there.

But anyway, hopefully you'll find this model useful.

I think it should be. People, this is the biggest investment of their life.

They should do serious analysis when they think about how they want approach it.

And I'd like to think that this is fairly serious analysis.

This is about as serious as you can get.

So enjoy! See you in the next video.

번역 0%

Renting vs. Buying (detailed analysis)발음듣기

Welcome. So I've done this series of presentations about housing.발음듣기

And at least, my thesis on why housing prices might have gone up, and how you should maybe, in simple terms, think about the rent-versus-buy decision.발음듣기

But one thing that's happened, a lot of people said, oh, Sal, you're making oversimplifying assumptions.발음듣기

You're assuming interest-only loans.발음듣기

You're not factoring in the tax deductions of mortgages, et cetera, of interest on your mortgage.발음듣기

Which I did, but I did make some simplifying assumptions.발음듣기

So that we could kind of do back of the envelope math, and just think about what the main drivers are when you think about renting versus buying.발음듣기

But it is fair. That's just kind of a first cut.발음듣기

You really should do a multi-line model, trying to figure out what could happen to you.발음듣기

And then tweak your assumptions. And really figure out what's going to happen to you if housing appreciates, depreciates.발음듣기

If interest rates change. If you put 10% down, or 20% down, or whatever.발음듣기

So with that in mind, I've constructed this model.발음듣기

What I called, this is the home purchase model.발음듣기

And you can download it yourself and play with it.발음듣기

I think this will prove to be useful for you.발음듣기

You can download it at khanacademy.org/ downloads/buyrent.xls.발음듣기

It's an Excel spreadsheet. So if you have Excel, you should be able to access it.발음듣기

And maybe you want to follow along while you watch this video.발음듣기

So just khanacademy.org/ downloads/buyrent.xls.발음듣기

So once you download it, let me explain what I assumed in the model.발음듣기

So what I did in yellow, both this bright yellow and this less bright yellow, these are our assumptions.발음듣기

These are the things that are going to drive the model, and tell us whether over - and I calculated over 10 years - whether we will do better renting versus buying.발음듣기

And so if you download this model and want to play with it yourself, unless you are fairly sophisticated with Excel, the only things you should change are the things in yellow.발음듣기

Everything else is calculated. And it's driven by these inputs.발음듣기

So of course, what matters in a home?발음듣기

Well the purchase price matters. So you just in put it there.발음듣기

The down payment matters. You could, if you want, you can just write like I wrote, 20% of whatever the purchase price is.발음듣기

So you can write the exact number, or you can just leave it the way I did.발음듣기

And whatever the down payment percentage is, it'll calculate it.발음듣기

This is the interest rate you assume.발음듣기

This is the principal amortization. So principal amortization just means, well, if I just keep paying this mortgage, after how long is the entire principal amount - not just interest, how long is the entire principal amount going to be paid off in?발음듣기

So essentially, a 30-year fixed rate loan has a 30 year principal amortization.발음듣기

If you have a 10-year loan, you'd put 10 here.발음듣기

This is the property tax rate.발음듣기

This is what I assume because I live in California, and in most areas of California, that's the property tax.발음듣기

This is what I assume about annual maintenance.발음듣기

That's just an assumption. Some houses might be less, might be more.발음듣기

That's up to you to decide.발음듣기

This is housing association dues. Maybe if you live in a community that has a shared golf course, or a shared pool or something.발음듣기

Put it at 0 if you don't.발음듣기

This is annual insurance, for things like hazard insurance, and flood insurance, earthquake insurance, or whatever insurance you need where you live.발음듣기

And in this bright yellow, I say, what is the assumed annual appreciation of the house itself?발음듣기

And this is a huge assumption.발음듣기

And that's why I put it into this bold yellow color.발음듣기

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.발음듣기

Or you could say the model is very, very, very sensitive to that assumption.발음듣기

Here, this is your assumed marginal income tax rate.발음듣기

And why does that matter? Well because you can deduct the interest that you spend on your mortgage.발음듣기

And also you can deduct, actually, the property tax.발음듣기

So if you can deduct $100 in interest and property tax, if your marginal tax rate is 30% - so that means at what rate are you being taxed on every incremental dollar.발음듣기

If it's 30%, that means a $100 deduction will save you $30.발음듣기

If your marginal tax rate is 20%, a $100 deduction will save you $20.발음듣기

So that's where that comes into play.발음듣기

The 2%, that's general inflation.발음듣기

And what this assumption drives is, well, there's going to be some inflation on things like housing association dues, annual maintenance, insurance.발음듣기

And so this, what you assume about, well, what is just the general rate of inflation, in our model that's actually going to drive how these grow over the life of your loan.발음듣기

And then once you type in all of these things, the monthly mortgage payment is calculated.발음듣기

I assumed that the interest compounds once a month.발음듣기

You can, if you know your geometric series, you can go in there and you can tweak it around so it compounds more frequently or less frequently.발음듣기

But my understanding is that most mortgages compound monthly.발음듣기

And then this right here, so this is everything that's driving the buying a home decision.발음듣기

Now these assumptions are so that we can make a comparison to, well, what if instead of using that down payment to buy a house, what if we actually just save that down payment, put it in the bank, and rent a house instead.발음듣기

So this is cost of renting a similar home.발음듣기

This is the annual rental price inflation.발음듣기

And I would argue, to some degree, that rental price inflation over the long term should not be that different than housing price inflation.발음듣기

Because to some degree, rental is kind of the earnings on a home.발음듣기

And if earnings increase and the overall asset doesn't increase, your return increases.발음듣기

Or the other way around. Your return decreases.발음듣기

But anyway, don't want to get too complicated.발음듣기

And then this is the 6%, or I just assume it's 6%.발음듣기

You can change it. This is what you assume that you can get on your cash.발음듣기

So if I don't put the $150,000 down deposit on the home, and I put it in, I don't know, maybe I'm a good investor.발음듣기

I could put in the stock market.발음듣기

Maybe I can get 20% a year.발음듣기

Or maybe I'm really risk averse, and I put it in government bonds, and I get 4% a year.발음듣기

So this is the assumption that you get in on that.발음듣기

And it actually should be an after-tax return on that cash.발음듣기

So if my tax rate is 30% and I think I can get 10% percent on the stock market, I should actually put a 7% here.발음듣기

So we want to make sure that we're completely accurate for taxes.발음듣기

So now let me explain the rest of the model to you.발음듣기

I want to make sure that I can fit it all within this window.발음듣기

Let me just squeeze this a little bit.발음듣기

Excel on YouTube is a new thing for me.발음듣기

That's not what I wanted to do.발음듣기

So let me unfreeze the window.발음듣기

OK. So now I can show you the rest of model.발음듣기

So all those assumptions that we did, that drives this model.발음듣기

Let me freeze the window right here.발음듣기

OK. That should make things a little bit easier.발음듣기

So this is the buying scenario, up to line 40.발음듣기

This says, OK, at period zero, what is the home value?발음듣기

And don't type in anything here.발음듣기

It's all automatically calculated. So at period zero, what is your home value?발음듣기

And then it uses essentially the appreciation numbers.발음듣기

And each period is essentially a month.발음듣기

I actually wrote that down here.발음듣기

And then it figures out, what is the market value of your home?발음듣기

And it's completely driven by that appreciation number.발음듣기

This right here is the debt, or essentially the principal payment on your mortgage, or how much do you owe to the bank.발음듣기

And as you see, as months go by, when you pay the mortgage note - and I show that right here, this mortgage payment.발음듣기

Some amount of that, which is line 33, the principal paid.발음듣기

Some of that goes to decrease the amount you owe.발음듣기

And then a lot of it, especially initially, goes to be actually the interest on the amount you owe.발음듣기

And then obviously, if you watch the video on introduction to balance sheets, your equity in the home is the value of the home minus the debt, or minus what you owe the bank.발음듣기

So this actually calculates your equity.발음듣기

Or essentially, one way to view it, is actually to say, well, what am I worth?발음듣기

Or what is this investment worth to me at that point?발음듣기

So these are kind of the important numbers in the home buying scenario.발음듣기

It is driven by - This interest on debt, it's calculated by what interest rate you assume, times the debt you owe and the period before.발음듣기

The mortgage payment, we calculated that before, using our mathematical knowledge of geometric series.발음듣기

The paid principal, that's going to be the mortgage payment minus your interest.발음듣기

Insurance payment, it's on a monthly basis, right?발음듣기

So we essentially took whatever our annual insurance payment was and we divide it by 12.발음듣기

But then we grow it by the rate of inflation on a monthly basis.발음듣기

So we took the inflation rate, divided by 12, and we multiplied by each of these months.발음듣기

The housing association dues, once again, this is on a monthly basis.발음듣기

So we just took your assumption, divided by 12.발음듣기

Maintenance, same thing. Property tax, same thing. Although I assumed that your house gets reassessed.발음듣기

So you're in a state where every year, or every several years, the assessor comes, says, oh, your house is worth more now, so I'm going to raise your taxes.발음듣기

That's not the case in a lot of parts of California.발음듣기

But it's the case in many parts of the U.S. So actually to some degree, this, the dollar value, the property tax is driven by this home value assumption up here.발음듣기

This income tax saving from interest deduction, this is assuming that at that marginal tax rate, you can deduct the property tax and the interest on the debt.발음듣기

And then this is the total cash outflow after adding back the income tax savings.발음듣기

So this is essentially how much cash goes out the door, even after the tax savings, every month, in the buying scenario.발음듣기

That's what that is. So hopefully that makes a little bit of sense.발음듣기

So what we want to do is, we want to figure out, OK, you could do that.발음듣기

You could buy the house, put $150,000 down.발음듣기

And every month put this much out, and as you see that number grows.발음듣기

The mortgage is the same, but a lot of these expenses grow with inflation.발음듣기

But I want to compare that to what happens if I take that exact amount of cash, after adjusting for how much money I get back from taxes.발음듣기

And if I said, well, I'm going to use that cash to pay my rent and any other expenses associated with renting - which really aren't much - to pay my rent, and then put the rest in the bank.발음듣기

So what we're saying is, well, that assumption was, that you can rent a similar house for $2,500.발음듣기

It may be right, it may be wrong.발음듣기

It's up for you to play with.발음듣기

And of course it grows with inflation slowly.발음듣기

Obviously your rent doesn't increase every month, but I assume it does fairly continuously.발음듣기

It's a reasonable assumption I think.발음듣기

Although you can change it. You can make it only step up every year.발음듣기

And then this line down here tells us the savings while renting.발음듣기

And I'm not saying the savings from, you know, something's on sale so I save money.발음듣기

But your savings in terms of how much you have in the bank.발음듣기

So if you rented instead of putting that $150,000 as a down payment, you could have put it in the bank.발음듣기

So that would be your savings account at period zero.발음듣기

And then your savings account at period one would be this amount of money and whatever return you got it, plus the difference between your cash out from buying a home and your rent.발음듣기

So this is your savings. So what I do in this model - and I could show you, I could scroll through multiple periods.발음듣기

Yeah, this model actually goes as far as Excel would let me.발음듣기

But the average house - anyone who's traded mortgage bonds will tell you - the average mortgage loan has a 10 year expected life.발음듣기

Because that's when, on average, people tend to move or refinance.발음듣기

So what I do is I figure out, well, given your assumptions you can make your own assumptions - given your assumptions, what is your home value?발음듣기

So let me make sure I can get to that.발음듣기

So given your assumptions, what this calculates is, well, it tells you what the home value is after 10 years, your debt after 10 years, your home equity after 10 years.발음듣기

And it assumes you were to sell your house.발음듣기

Because that's what the average American does after 10 years.발음듣기

And so what is the transaction cost?발음듣기

You pay 6% to a broker.발음듣기

Hopefully that won't be the case in 10 years and the internet will dis-intermediate real estate brokers, but who knows.발음듣기

I apologize to if you are broker.발음듣기

And then this line, line 54, that tells you what the net cash is if you sell your house at a market price, you pay the broker.발음듣기

This number right here is much simpler to some degree.발음듣기

It just tells you, well let's say you decided not to buy the house.발음듣기

Given all your assumptions, how much would you have saved in the bank at that time?발음듣기

And so this number right here, this number is the difference between those two numbers in 10 years, discounted back to today.발음듣기

Actually I meant to present value it.발음듣기

But did I present value these numbers?발음듣기

Oh no, I didn't. So actually this was meant to be the present value.발음듣기

I'm going to correct that before you actually play with the model.발음듣기

Right now I just took the 10 year value, so this is the value in year 10.발음듣기

This is the difference between the two.발음듣기

The present value would be if you discount this by some discount rate.발음듣기

Whatever you think, probably the inflation rate.발음듣기

And it would tell you in today's money, what is the benefit or the advantage of buying versus renting?발음듣기

Anyway I've spent 14 minutes of your time.발음듣기

I encourage you to download this model, play with it, and then work out the assumptions.발음듣기

Because I think that's the important thing.발음듣기

Some people, they'll make some set of assumptions and say, ah-ha!발음듣기

I should rent. Or they say, ah-ha!발음듣기

I should buy. But they don't realize that they made some assumptions.발음듣기

That although it looks really reasonable, let's say I make this 3% annual appreciation assumption.발음듣기

That doesn't seem crazy. But it's amazing how much it'll change the model if you make that 3% into a 1%, or if you make it into even a negative 1% or negative 2%.발음듣기

It's completely possible. It's happened before in the past that you have flat real estate prices for a significant period of time, even 10 years.발음듣기

And actually most of the studies show that real estate, over the last 100 years, has actually roughly grown, in real terms, maybe 1% or 2%.발음듣기

So actually 1% or 2% percent here isn't that conservative.발음듣기

And actually especially after a big real estate boom, may be prudent.발음듣기

So play with these assumptions. And I think it'll give you an intuition of what are the real drivers.발음듣기

Another big thing - sometimes you don't rent a similar home.발음듣기

You'd rent a smaller home. So that would be a different type of savings.발음듣기

And there are trade-offs there.발음듣기

But anyway, hopefully you'll find this model useful.발음듣기

I think it should be. People, this is the biggest investment of their life.발음듣기

They should do serious analysis when they think about how they want approach it.발음듣기

And I'd like to think that this is fairly serious analysis.발음듣기

This is about as serious as you can get.발음듣기

So enjoy! See you in the next video.발음듣기

Top