Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points

125문장 0% 중국어 번역 0명 참여 출처 : 칸아카데미
4 영상보기
영어 to
중국어
2단 보기 1단 보기

Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points

As we go into January of 1918, let's remind ourselves of the context, the background that's going on, especially relative to World War I.

First of all in April of 1917, a lot of the context is what happened in 1917, you have the U.S. declares war on Germany.

The main argument they give is this unrestricted submarine warfare that the Germans are undertaking.

You also have the fall of the Russian Empire... Fall of Russian Empire…

You have the revolution that overthrows the Czar in February, March of 1917, and then in October, you have the Bolsheviks take over in a coup.

This essentially, the Bolsheviks, once they take over, they have no interest in terms of continuing the war with Germany.

So you have an armistice declared and the Russians are in the process of negotiating the terms of a treaty with the Central Powers.

They're kind of negotiating the Bolshevik Treaty as we speak.

On top of that, you have, because the central powers don't have to focus on Russia on the eastern front anymore, they're trying to bring their, especially Germany, is trying to bring its troops back to the western front, and they want to do it before the U.S. can mobilize in any significant way.

So, race on western front ... western front ...

Between, essentially, can Germany get its troops and do an offensive that can put probably France out of the war before the U.S. has a chance to significantly reinforce the western front?

This is essentially between German, redeploy troops from the eastern front, German troops ... troops from eastern, from eastern front versus new American troops ... versus new Americans.

This is the backdrop.

No one really knew what exactly was going to happen on the western front.

Certain military analysts will say Germany was able to prosecute this two front war against a major empire and Russia, now they're going to be able to focus completely on the western front, Germany might be able to deal the decisive blow.

Others would say the U.S. it's this emerging power, it's bringing fresh troops in, it has a major industrial capacity.

The U.S. could, especially if the war were to last a good bit, the U.S. might be the decisive element for the allies.

So that's the background in which President Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson on January of 1918, January 8th, gives a speech to the joint sessions of congress.

This is part of the text of the speech, I'm just going to read through it, I'm not going to read the entire speech.

He talks about many things, essentially; why are we in World War I, what is the moral causes of World War I, and his speech is most famous for his articulation of the "Fourteen Points".

Let's just read into it because it really informs a lot of what happened in the Treaty of Versailles, which is essentially the peace treaty with Germany, which the U.S. ironically did not ratify, but it also lays out the tension in the Paris Peace Conferences after World War I between those who were more idealistic like Woodrow Wilson, and those who might have been a little bit more vengeful, especially against the Central Powers.

Here we go, this is part of the speech: "We enter this war because violations of right had occurred which touched us to the quick and made the life of our own people impossible unless they were corrected and the world secured once for all against their recurrence."

'"What we demand in this war, therefore, is nothing peculiar to ourselves. It is that the world be made fit and safe to live in ..."

This is very idealistic.

Remember, all these others, especially these European powers are all about who gets what land, who gets what empire, who gets to take advantage of whatever colony.

'"... and particularly that it be made safe for every peace-loving nation which, like our own, wishes to live its own life, determine is own institutions, be assured of justice and fair dealing by the other peoples of the world as against force and selfish aggression.

All the peoples of the world are in effect partners in this interest, and for our own part, we see very clearly that unless justice be done to others it will not be done to us.

The program of the world's peace, therefore, is our program; and that program, the only possible program, all we see it, is this:"

These are his Fourteen Points and I'll try to kind of give some context for each of them.

The first is: "Open covenants of peace, openly arrived at, after which there shall be no private international understandings of any kind but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view."

The context here is actually after the Bolsheviks took over, they started releasing all these secret covenants and understandings that the Russian Empire had been getting into.

We've already talked about all the entanglements and the alliances that led to World War I, so this is Wilson's attempt to say, "Hey, let's just do everything out in the open.

That'll let everyone kind of know, give more transparency, what may or may not occur, based on their actions."

Number 2, "Absolute freedom of navigation upon the seas, outside territorial waters, alike in peace and in war, except as the seas may be closed in whole or in part by international action for the enforcement of international covenants."

So no more of these British blockades, no more of this unrestricted submarine warfare, the only time we can dictate what happens in open waters is if the international community trying to decide that it wants to enforce international covenants.

Number 3, "The removal of all economic barriers and the establishment of equality of trade conditions among all the nations consenting to the peace and associating themselves for its maintenance."

So essentially, it's free trade... free trade …

Number 4, "Adequate guarantees given and taken that national armaments will be reduced to the lowest point consistent with domestic safety."

So he's trying to undo some of this militarism, this buildup of arms that essentially allowed World War I to happen with the ferocity that it did and with the quickness with which it did.

Number 5, "A free, open-minded, and absolutely impartial adjustment of all colonial claims, based upon a strict observance to the principle that in determining all such questions of sovereignty the interests of the populations concerned must have equal weight with the equitable claims of the government whose title is to be determined."

This is a big deal that probably did not make the British or the French happy.

This is essentially saying self-determination, the people who are in those nations, in those states, their interests matter just as much.

'"A free open-minded absolutely impartial adjustment of all colonial claims."

This is a pretty big deal.

Remember, we're kind of exiting this period of empires, most of the European powers still think that these international empires are essentially part of their prestige.

Number 6, "The evacuation of all Russian territory and such a settlement of all questions affecting Russia as will secure the best and freest cooperation of the other nations of the world in obtaining for her an unhampered and unembarrassed opportunity for the independent determination of her own political development and national policy and assure her of a sincere welcome into the society of free nations under institutions of her own choosing ...

'"This is still one sentence and then you put period there, semi-colon ..."

'"And I guess he had to read that himself, " …

'"And, more than a welcome, assistance also of every kind that she may need and may herself desire."

'"The treatment accorded Russia by her sister nations in the months to come ..."

Remember, they're negotiating with the Central Powers on Brest-Litovsk, " ... to come will be the acid test of their good will, of their comprehension of her needs as distinguished from their own interests, and of their intelligent and unselfish sympathy."

So it's saying look, Wilson doesn't know whether the allies or the Central Powers are going to win on the western front, but they know that the Central Powers are dictating terms to Russia with Brest-Litovsk.

It's like, this is going to be a test of your good will, of your comprehension of the need of this newly-emerging of state now that the Bolsheviks have taken over.

Obviously at this point, you don't have the antagonism between the U.S. and the future Soviet Union that is going to emerge.

They're saying give Russia a chance to be herself.

Number 7, "Belgium, the whole world will agree, must be evacuated and restored, without any attempt to limit the sovereignty which she enjoys in common with all other free nations."

This is kind of obvious.

When the Germans rolled through Belgium, that's how they got to France.

It was a justification that Great Britain used for entering the war, so get out of Belgium.

Number 8, "All French territories should be freed and invaded portions restored, and the wrong done to France by Prussia in 1871 in the matter of Alsace-Lorraine, which has unsettled the peace of the world for nearly fifty years, should be righted, in order that peace may once more be made secure in the interest of all."

Alsace-Lorraine, we've touched on it several times.

That's this region right over here.

It was taken by Germany, essentially the unification of Germany during the Franco-Prussian War, which was a [unintelligible] region.

This was one of the justifications, this was why France might have gone into a war with Germany, and what Germany almost wanted to be preemptive against France because they said France might want to take some of that territory back.

9, "A readjustment of the frontiers of Italy should be effected along clearly recognizable lines of nationality."

Hey, where do people speak Italian?

10, "The peoples of Austria-Hungary, whose place among the nations we wish to see safeguarded and assured, should be accorded the freest opportunity of autonomous development."

This is another big deal.

It's another breaking up of an empire.

It's another self-determination point of the "Fourteen Points".

Austria-Hungary, we've already said it was an empire.

It included many, many, many nationalities.

You have the Czechs right around there.

You have the Slovacs right around there.

You have the Austrians, German-speaking people, right over there.

You have the Hungarians, roughly over there.

You have the Slovenians roughly over there.

You have the Croatians roughly over there.

You have the Bosnians roughly over there.

You have many, many other nationalities especially as you get close to the border with Romania and the border with the Ukraine.

It's like, let these people determine, let them determine their own fate to some degree.

There are all these nationalities.

That was number 10.

'"The freest opportunity to autonomous development."

He's not saying that they necessarily need their own states, but that they should have the opportunity to self-govern in some way.

Number 11, "Romania, Serbia, and Montenegro should be evacuated; occupied territories restored; Serbia accorded free and secure access to the sea;"

'"and the relations of the several Balkan states to one another determined by friendly counsel along historically established lines of allegiance and nationality; and international guarantees of the political and economic independence and territorial integrity of the several Balkan states should be entered into."

This is kind of laying the groundwork for the future state of Yugoslavia, which is going to be roughly over there.

It's kind of the state of the southern Slavs, which is what the whole motivation [unintelligible] for assassinating Archduke Ferdinand which some would argue was kind of the spark that lit World War I.

'"The Turkish portions of the present Ottoman Empire should be assured a secure sovereignty, but the other nationalities which are now under Turkish rule should be assured an undoubted security of life and an absolutely unmolested opportunity of an autonomous development ..."

Once again, self-determination.

'"... and the Dardanelles should be permanently opened as a free passage to the ships and commerce of all nations under international guarantees."

So the Dardanelles, we've talked about it before, that is, that's this right over here, so that you have access between the Aegean Sea and the Black Sea.

And we are almost there.

So then you have, "An independent Polish state should be erected which should include the territories inhabited by indisputably Polish populations, which should be assured a free and secure access to the sea, and whose political and economic independence and territorial integrity should be guaranteed by international covenant."

Poland did not exist as its own state prior to World War I.

Now you have Woodrow Wilson is advocating it.

It will be carved out roughly of this area right over there.

Then finally, point 14, "A general association of nations must be formed under specific covenants for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small states alike."

This is essentially, this is the point, that leads to the formation of the League of Nations.

When we talk about big ideas, this is a big idea, especially back then.

You have Europe who keeps getting into wars with each other.

Hey, why don't we all cooperate at this middle level and we have this club of all of the nations to resolve disputes and make sure that we don't have another World War I.

So, very, very, very big idealistic idea, it gets formed as an outcome of the Treaty of Versailles, which is drafted during the Paris Peace Conferences after World War I.

The unfortunate thing of the League of Nations is that even though this was kind of, the idea was coming from Woodrow Wilson, the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations was not ratified by the U.S.

The U.S. never entered the League of Nations, which kind of made it a little bit hollow, and the League of Nations did not have the power to stop World War II from happening only a few decades later, and would later be replaced by the United Nations.

This is a really, really, really, really big idea.

Because of these big ideas, Woodrow Wilson, these very idealistic ideas, everyone in Europe is talking about territory and imperialism and how do they take control of other people, take control of their resources, and now you have the American President saying it's all about self-determination.

It's about making the world safe for democracy, safe for commerce, about open agreements.

It's a very powerful idea.

This would kind of form the basis, the more idealistic side of American Foreign Policy over the 20th Century.

Some would say that there's another very cynical side that takes into account self-interest, but this is the idealistic side of American Foreign Policy, especially through the 20th Century.

For this, for his work in this in this area, Woodrow Wilson wins the Nobel Prize a few years later.

This right here is a picture of the Nobel Prize looks like, both sides of it.

Now, just to kind of foreshadow some of the tension as we get into the Paris Peace Conference, not everyone was as idealistic.

You obviously these European powers who bled much harder than the Americans did, although the Americans did contribute significant cost, or troops, to the effort and they lost many, many folks.

Obviously if you're French, you had these Germans on your territory.

You lost a significant fraction of your population, a huge fraction of your male population.

You might be a little bit angrier.

So of course, you have Georges Clemenceau who was the Prime Minister of France.

He was a little bit more skeptical of the "Fourteen Points".

This is a quote from him, he actually has many slightly entertaining quotes, "Mr. Wilson bores me with his "Fourteen Points while God Almighty has only ten."

This will kind of foreshadow some of the tension between Clemenceau and the British, and European allies on one side, and the Americans as we go to the Paris Peace Conference.

They were a little bit looking out more for revenge, especially against the Germans while the Americans, especially Woodrow Wilson, was a lot more idealistic.

번역 0%

Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

As we go into January of 1918, let's remind ourselves of the context, the background that's going on, especially relative to World War I.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

First of all in April of 1917, a lot of the context is what happened in 1917, you have the U.S. declares war on Germany.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

The main argument they give is this unrestricted submarine warfare that the Germans are undertaking.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You also have the fall of the Russian Empire... Fall of Russian Empire…발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have the revolution that overthrows the Czar in February, March of 1917, and then in October, you have the Bolsheviks take over in a coup.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This essentially, the Bolsheviks, once they take over, they have no interest in terms of continuing the war with Germany.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So you have an armistice declared and the Russians are in the process of negotiating the terms of a treaty with the Central Powers.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

They're kind of negotiating the Bolshevik Treaty as we speak.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

On top of that, you have, because the central powers don't have to focus on Russia on the eastern front anymore, they're trying to bring their, especially Germany, is trying to bring its troops back to the western front, and they want to do it before the U.S. can mobilize in any significant way.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So, race on western front ... western front ...발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Between, essentially, can Germany get its troops and do an offensive that can put probably France out of the war before the U.S. has a chance to significantly reinforce the western front?발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is essentially between German, redeploy troops from the eastern front, German troops ... troops from eastern, from eastern front versus new American troops ... versus new Americans.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is the backdrop.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

No one really knew what exactly was going to happen on the western front.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Certain military analysts will say Germany was able to prosecute this two front war against a major empire and Russia, now they're going to be able to focus completely on the western front, Germany might be able to deal the decisive blow.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Others would say the U.S. it's this emerging power, it's bringing fresh troops in, it has a major industrial capacity.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

The U.S. could, especially if the war were to last a good bit, the U.S. might be the decisive element for the allies.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So that's the background in which President Wilson, President Woodrow Wilson on January of 1918, January 8th, gives a speech to the joint sessions of congress.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is part of the text of the speech, I'm just going to read through it, I'm not going to read the entire speech.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

He talks about many things, essentially; why are we in World War I, what is the moral causes of World War I, and his speech is most famous for his articulation of the "Fourteen Points".발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Let's just read into it because it really informs a lot of what happened in the Treaty of Versailles, which is essentially the peace treaty with Germany, which the U.S. ironically did not ratify, but it also lays out the tension in the Paris Peace Conferences after World War I between those who were more idealistic like Woodrow Wilson, and those who might have been a little bit more vengeful, especially against the Central Powers.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Here we go, this is part of the speech: "We enter this war because violations of right had occurred which touched us to the quick and made the life of our own people impossible unless they were corrected and the world secured once for all against their recurrence."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"What we demand in this war, therefore, is nothing peculiar to ourselves. It is that the world be made fit and safe to live in ..."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is very idealistic.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Remember, all these others, especially these European powers are all about who gets what land, who gets what empire, who gets to take advantage of whatever colony.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"... and particularly that it be made safe for every peace-loving nation which, like our own, wishes to live its own life, determine is own institutions, be assured of justice and fair dealing by the other peoples of the world as against force and selfish aggression.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

All the peoples of the world are in effect partners in this interest, and for our own part, we see very clearly that unless justice be done to others it will not be done to us.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

The program of the world's peace, therefore, is our program; and that program, the only possible program, all we see it, is this:"발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

These are his Fourteen Points and I'll try to kind of give some context for each of them.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

The first is: "Open covenants of peace, openly arrived at, after which there shall be no private international understandings of any kind but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in the public view."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

The context here is actually after the Bolsheviks took over, they started releasing all these secret covenants and understandings that the Russian Empire had been getting into.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

We've already talked about all the entanglements and the alliances that led to World War I, so this is Wilson's attempt to say, "Hey, let's just do everything out in the open.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

That'll let everyone kind of know, give more transparency, what may or may not occur, based on their actions."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Number 2, "Absolute freedom of navigation upon the seas, outside territorial waters, alike in peace and in war, except as the seas may be closed in whole or in part by international action for the enforcement of international covenants."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So no more of these British blockades, no more of this unrestricted submarine warfare, the only time we can dictate what happens in open waters is if the international community trying to decide that it wants to enforce international covenants.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Number 3, "The removal of all economic barriers and the establishment of equality of trade conditions among all the nations consenting to the peace and associating themselves for its maintenance."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So essentially, it's free trade... free trade …발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Number 4, "Adequate guarantees given and taken that national armaments will be reduced to the lowest point consistent with domestic safety."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So he's trying to undo some of this militarism, this buildup of arms that essentially allowed World War I to happen with the ferocity that it did and with the quickness with which it did.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Number 5, "A free, open-minded, and absolutely impartial adjustment of all colonial claims, based upon a strict observance to the principle that in determining all such questions of sovereignty the interests of the populations concerned must have equal weight with the equitable claims of the government whose title is to be determined."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is a big deal that probably did not make the British or the French happy.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is essentially saying self-determination, the people who are in those nations, in those states, their interests matter just as much.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"A free open-minded absolutely impartial adjustment of all colonial claims."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is a pretty big deal.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Remember, we're kind of exiting this period of empires, most of the European powers still think that these international empires are essentially part of their prestige.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Number 6, "The evacuation of all Russian territory and such a settlement of all questions affecting Russia as will secure the best and freest cooperation of the other nations of the world in obtaining for her an unhampered and unembarrassed opportunity for the independent determination of her own political development and national policy and assure her of a sincere welcome into the society of free nations under institutions of her own choosing ...발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"This is still one sentence and then you put period there, semi-colon ..."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"And I guess he had to read that himself, " …발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"And, more than a welcome, assistance also of every kind that she may need and may herself desire."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"The treatment accorded Russia by her sister nations in the months to come ..."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Remember, they're negotiating with the Central Powers on Brest-Litovsk, " ... to come will be the acid test of their good will, of their comprehension of her needs as distinguished from their own interests, and of their intelligent and unselfish sympathy."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So it's saying look, Wilson doesn't know whether the allies or the Central Powers are going to win on the western front, but they know that the Central Powers are dictating terms to Russia with Brest-Litovsk.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It's like, this is going to be a test of your good will, of your comprehension of the need of this newly-emerging of state now that the Bolsheviks have taken over.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Obviously at this point, you don't have the antagonism between the U.S. and the future Soviet Union that is going to emerge.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

They're saying give Russia a chance to be herself.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Number 7, "Belgium, the whole world will agree, must be evacuated and restored, without any attempt to limit the sovereignty which she enjoys in common with all other free nations."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is kind of obvious.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

When the Germans rolled through Belgium, that's how they got to France.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It was a justification that Great Britain used for entering the war, so get out of Belgium.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Number 8, "All French territories should be freed and invaded portions restored, and the wrong done to France by Prussia in 1871 in the matter of Alsace-Lorraine, which has unsettled the peace of the world for nearly fifty years, should be righted, in order that peace may once more be made secure in the interest of all."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Alsace-Lorraine, we've touched on it several times.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

That's this region right over here.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It was taken by Germany, essentially the unification of Germany during the Franco-Prussian War, which was a [unintelligible] region.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This was one of the justifications, this was why France might have gone into a war with Germany, and what Germany almost wanted to be preemptive against France because they said France might want to take some of that territory back.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

9, "A readjustment of the frontiers of Italy should be effected along clearly recognizable lines of nationality."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Hey, where do people speak Italian?발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

10, "The peoples of Austria-Hungary, whose place among the nations we wish to see safeguarded and assured, should be accorded the freest opportunity of autonomous development."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is another big deal.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It's another breaking up of an empire.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It's another self-determination point of the "Fourteen Points".발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Austria-Hungary, we've already said it was an empire.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It included many, many, many nationalities.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have the Czechs right around there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have the Slovacs right around there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have the Austrians, German-speaking people, right over there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have the Hungarians, roughly over there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have the Slovenians roughly over there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have the Croatians roughly over there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have the Bosnians roughly over there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have many, many other nationalities especially as you get close to the border with Romania and the border with the Ukraine.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It's like, let these people determine, let them determine their own fate to some degree.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

There are all these nationalities.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

That was number 10.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"The freest opportunity to autonomous development."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

He's not saying that they necessarily need their own states, but that they should have the opportunity to self-govern in some way.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Number 11, "Romania, Serbia, and Montenegro should be evacuated; occupied territories restored; Serbia accorded free and secure access to the sea;"발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"and the relations of the several Balkan states to one another determined by friendly counsel along historically established lines of allegiance and nationality; and international guarantees of the political and economic independence and territorial integrity of the several Balkan states should be entered into."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is kind of laying the groundwork for the future state of Yugoslavia, which is going to be roughly over there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It's kind of the state of the southern Slavs, which is what the whole motivation [unintelligible] for assassinating Archduke Ferdinand which some would argue was kind of the spark that lit World War I.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"The Turkish portions of the present Ottoman Empire should be assured a secure sovereignty, but the other nationalities which are now under Turkish rule should be assured an undoubted security of life and an absolutely unmolested opportunity of an autonomous development ..."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Once again, self-determination.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

'"... and the Dardanelles should be permanently opened as a free passage to the ships and commerce of all nations under international guarantees."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So the Dardanelles, we've talked about it before, that is, that's this right over here, so that you have access between the Aegean Sea and the Black Sea.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

And we are almost there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So then you have, "An independent Polish state should be erected which should include the territories inhabited by indisputably Polish populations, which should be assured a free and secure access to the sea, and whose political and economic independence and territorial integrity should be guaranteed by international covenant."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Poland did not exist as its own state prior to World War I.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Now you have Woodrow Wilson is advocating it.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It will be carved out roughly of this area right over there.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Then finally, point 14, "A general association of nations must be formed under specific covenants for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small states alike."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is essentially, this is the point, that leads to the formation of the League of Nations.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

When we talk about big ideas, this is a big idea, especially back then.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You have Europe who keeps getting into wars with each other.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Hey, why don't we all cooperate at this middle level and we have this club of all of the nations to resolve disputes and make sure that we don't have another World War I.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So, very, very, very big idealistic idea, it gets formed as an outcome of the Treaty of Versailles, which is drafted during the Paris Peace Conferences after World War I.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

The unfortunate thing of the League of Nations is that even though this was kind of, the idea was coming from Woodrow Wilson, the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations was not ratified by the U.S.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

The U.S. never entered the League of Nations, which kind of made it a little bit hollow, and the League of Nations did not have the power to stop World War II from happening only a few decades later, and would later be replaced by the United Nations.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is a really, really, really, really big idea.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Because of these big ideas, Woodrow Wilson, these very idealistic ideas, everyone in Europe is talking about territory and imperialism and how do they take control of other people, take control of their resources, and now you have the American President saying it's all about self-determination.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It's about making the world safe for democracy, safe for commerce, about open agreements.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It's a very powerful idea.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This would kind of form the basis, the more idealistic side of American Foreign Policy over the 20th Century.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Some would say that there's another very cynical side that takes into account self-interest, but this is the idealistic side of American Foreign Policy, especially through the 20th Century.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

For this, for his work in this in this area, Woodrow Wilson wins the Nobel Prize a few years later.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This right here is a picture of the Nobel Prize looks like, both sides of it.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Now, just to kind of foreshadow some of the tension as we get into the Paris Peace Conference, not everyone was as idealistic.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You obviously these European powers who bled much harder than the Americans did, although the Americans did contribute significant cost, or troops, to the effort and they lost many, many folks.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Obviously if you're French, you had these Germans on your territory.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You lost a significant fraction of your population, a huge fraction of your male population.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You might be a little bit angrier.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So of course, you have Georges Clemenceau who was the Prime Minister of France.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

He was a little bit more skeptical of the "Fourteen Points".발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This is a quote from him, he actually has many slightly entertaining quotes, "Mr. Wilson bores me with his "Fourteen Points while God Almighty has only ten."발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

This will kind of foreshadow some of the tension between Clemenceau and the British, and European allies on one side, and the Americans as we go to the Paris Peace Conference.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

They were a little bit looking out more for revenge, especially against the Germans while the Americans, especially Woodrow Wilson, was a lot more idealistic.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

칸아카데미 더보기더 보기

전체보기
Top