Francis Bacon, Triptych - August 1972, 1972발음듣기
Francis Bacon, Triptych - August 1972, 1972
Normally when I think of a triptych I think of a renaissance or a medieval alter piece that's in three panels that're connected and therefore something that is spiritual, religious scenes, but here we are in the twentieth century using that format.발음듣기
These were deeply personal paintings and the subject couldn't be closer to home for the artist.발음듣기
That seems very psychological and personal and emotional and profound from the way that he's treating the human body.발음듣기
So, within these very spare renderings, we have the representation of George Dyer on the left.발음듣기
In fact this painting is seen as one of a series of black paintings that are, in a way, a kind of chronicle of his response to this event.발음듣기
We have the artist himself as a self portrait and then in the middle we've got this composite creature.발음듣기
The reference that's usually drawn by art historians is to the English photographer Muybridge who invented the strobe light and was the first person to use photography to freeze animals and people in action.발음듣기
In fact, in his torso that blackness that's that panel in the back seems to kind of move forward and take over this figure's body.발음듣기
The eyes are closed, the head tilts up slightly as though there's a way that the figure is somehow transcending the body as the body is being consumed.발음듣기
We can see that shadow that he seems to cast almost as a kind of a pool of flesh to the lower right in some terrible way.발음듣기
The entire set of paintings places these figures in a kind of isolation in a very spare, very abstracted space.발음듣기
On the other hand, both panels on either side, although they are flat, they have some sense of dimension by the diagonal line that's in front of either one.발음듣기
It's almost as though the middle space where those two figures are joined, perhaps where he's rejoined with his lover, in some space beyond the physical, we have the most abstracted space whereas in the two other panels, as you said, there's that conceptual transcendent flat space that's in conflict somehow with the organic, three dimensional shapes of the figures.발음듣기
Yeah, that's interesting in another sense because of course Bacon, although he's working in Britain, is very much of the generation of the abstract expressionists.발음듣기
Bacon, quite distinctly, and very much unlike the Americans, is maintaining the primacy of the figure.발음듣기
So these are very hard edged, abstract shapes, yet one easily recalls the abstract expressionism.발음듣기
They're both responding to similar existential issues that have to do with the isolation of the figure, the meaning of the figure.발음듣기
On the other hand, still having the presence of something that one can recognize, especially the human figure, does give us a handle.발음듣기
There's something really extraordinary about taking the human figure, painting it so beautifully but then attacking it, cutting into it, melting it away, making it so grotesque.발음듣기
칸아카데미 더보기더 보기
-
20문장 0%번역 좋아요1
번역하기 -
Introduction to the Vedic Period
78문장 0%번역 좋아요3
번역하기 -
Antonin Dvorak. Symphony 5(9). Analysis by Ge...
49문장 0%번역 좋아요3
번역하기 -
70문장 0%번역 좋아요1
번역하기