The funky -ed irregular verb

23문장 0% 베트남어 번역 0명 참여 출처 : 칸아카데미
1 영상보기
영어 to
베트남어
2단 보기 1단 보기

The funky -ed irregular verb

[Voiceover] Hello Grammarians, we're talking about irregular verbs.

That is to say that verbs that aren't formed like regular verbs.

And to give you a taste of what regular verbs look like, just as a refresher, let's take the word walk.

Let's put it in the present tense.

Now normally under normal circumstances, we'd wanna just add an 'ed' to it in order to form the simple past tense.

So we go from walk to walked.

We add this 'ed' ending.

And it turns out that there are a lot of irregular verbs that also behave the same way.

When we make the past tense we have this 'ed' sound.

It's just that they're not represented that way in the spelling.

I'll give you an example.

The present tense form of the word to 'sleep' is 'sleep'.

And when we put it in past tense it is not 'sleeped' but 'slept'.

The pt part of 'slept' does the same work as the 'ed' ending, for the regular plural.

So 'sleep' becomes 'slept', is the same as 'walk' becomes 'walked'.

Likewise 'keep' becomes 'kept', 'build' becomes 'built', 'spend' becomes 'spent', 'leave' becomes 'left', 'leap' becomes 'leapt' and 'lose' becomes 'lost'.

So although these verbs are all irregular verbs, within their irregularity, at least in this case there is some common distinctions.

They're all still trying to make the same sound as walked, it just displays differently.

So it's not 'sleeped' but 'slept', not 'keeped' but 'kept', not 'builded' but 'built', not 'spended' but 'spent', not 'leaved' but 'left', not 'leaped' but 'leapt', not 'losed' but 'lost'.

At least as it applies to modern standard English.

And that my friends is the funky 'ed'.

You can learn anything. David out.

번역 0%

The funky -ed irregular verb발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

[Voiceover] Hello Grammarians, we're talking about irregular verbs.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

That is to say that verbs that aren't formed like regular verbs.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

And to give you a taste of what regular verbs look like, just as a refresher, let's take the word walk.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Let's put it in the present tense.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Now normally under normal circumstances, we'd wanna just add an 'ed' to it in order to form the simple past tense.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So we go from walk to walked.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

We add this 'ed' ending.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

And it turns out that there are a lot of irregular verbs that also behave the same way.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

When we make the past tense we have this 'ed' sound.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

It's just that they're not represented that way in the spelling.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

I'll give you an example.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

The present tense form of the word to 'sleep' is 'sleep'.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

And when we put it in past tense it is not 'sleeped' but 'slept'.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

The pt part of 'slept' does the same work as the 'ed' ending, for the regular plural.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So 'sleep' becomes 'slept', is the same as 'walk' becomes 'walked'.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

Likewise 'keep' becomes 'kept', 'build' becomes 'built', 'spend' becomes 'spent', 'leave' becomes 'left', 'leap' becomes 'leapt' and 'lose' becomes 'lost'.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So although these verbs are all irregular verbs, within their irregularity, at least in this case there is some common distinctions.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

They're all still trying to make the same sound as walked, it just displays differently.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

So it's not 'sleeped' but 'slept', not 'keeped' but 'kept', not 'builded' but 'built', not 'spended' but 'spent', not 'leaved' but 'left', not 'leaped' but 'leapt', not 'losed' but 'lost'.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

At least as it applies to modern standard English.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

And that my friends is the funky 'ed'.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

You can learn anything. David out.발음듣기

다른 번역문 등록

칸아카데미 더보기더 보기

전체보기
Top