Introduction to democracy and its broad variations발음듣기
대기중
Introduction to democracy and its broad variations
82문장
0%
인도네시아어 번역 1명 참여
출처 : 칸아카데미
번역
0%
[Instructor] What we're going to do in this video is dig a little bit deeper into the notion of democracy.발음듣기
대기중
And the reason why this is going to be valuable is it's going to inform the decisions that the Founding Fathers had to make when they thought about whether to ratify the Constitution.발음듣기
대기중
So just as a review, and this is something that we have talked about in other videos democracy comes from Greek from rule by the people.발음듣기
대기중
Demo from demos, which is referring to people and curacy coming from Katia, which is referring to rule.발음듣기
대기중
Now broadly speaking, we can think of three general flavors of democracy, the first we can consider to be participatory. Participatory democracy.발음듣기
대기중
Yes, as you might have guessed it implies broad participation of the population. Broad participation.발음듣기
대기중
And if there's an issue of whether to build a stop light at an intersection or a change in some of the zoning laws you can imagine a large chunk of the down showing up to weigh in on that decision.발음듣기
대기중
Now, what are some of the benefits of a participatory democracy and what are some of the negatives?발음듣기
대기중
Well, the benefits are, and I'll do those as pluses a benefit is, well, it kind of seems closest to the original spirit of a democracy.발음듣기
대기중
It's coming out of ancient Greece, ancient Athens the birthplace of democracy where you did have residents go together and debate the major issues.발음듣기
대기중
Although even in ancient Athens you have to take participation with a grain of salt because it wasn't everyone who was participating.발음듣기
대기중
It was, for the most part, wealthy men who had the time to actually sit and debate these issues.발음듣기
대기중
But, if we want to give a participatory democracy its credit say in a small town, is that you really are representing the views of the people.발음듣기
대기중
Or we're dealing with a country where we're talking about tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands or millions or tens of millions of people?발음듣기
대기중
Sure, if you're in a town you can think about whether an intersection should be there or whether they should put a stop light there.발음듣기
대기중
But if we're talking about matters of national or international importance influencing hundreds of millions of people can you depend on people to be informed about the intricacies of the banking system or the military or foreign policy?발음듣기
대기중
And there really aren't any good examples in history of direct democracy scaling in significant ways beyond fairly small groups of people.발음듣기
대기중
In the United States the biggest scale where you might see this are in things like ballot measures at the city or the state level where people are directly voting on certain measures or certain laws.발음듣기
대기중
So you have many different parties and many different competing interests that are going to have a vigorous debate with each other on deciding what are the best ideas.발음듣기
대기중
You can think about all of the different lobbyists all of the different groups that represent different types of people trying to convince members of Congress, either at the national level or even at the state level that their interest is right.발음듣기
대기중
Even within Congress, even though you have two major parties you can have different factions that are really trying to argue it out.발음듣기
대기중
Well, you can imagine that because there is this vigorous debate, maybe the good ideas surface.발음듣기
대기중
Well, maybe all of this debate and argument is very inefficient, maybe it's slow decision making.발음듣기
대기중
Some things like gridlock because people can't agree to things that in order for anything to get done you have to make too many people happy and they all have their interests.발음듣기
대기중
Now, the last category that we're gonna talk about is the idea of an elite democracy and this is where you have more limited participation.발음듣기
대기중
And even though I gave ancient Athens as an example of a participatory democracy it really was more of an elite democracy where the people had the time.발음듣기
대기중
And the influence and the money those were the ones who were really weighing in on the issues of ancient Athens.발음듣기
대기중
And if you were to go to the Roman republic the Roman senators, these were, once again, elite men.발음듣기
대기중
Well, one might be that these elites, so to speak maybe they are more educated than the general public.발음듣기
대기중
And so that allows them to make more informed decisions especially on things that are quite complex that would be hard for everyone to weigh in on.발음듣기
대기중
If you're going to change a new accounting standard or think about how do you relegate the telecommunications industry.발음듣기
대기중
Or some very sophisticated trade negotiation or foreign policy negotiation, that education might help.발음듣기
대기중
The participatory they might be able to appeal to maybe baser instincts, just, you know, people's passions while the pluralists.발음듣기
대기중
Since you have all of these groups competing even if something makes sense they might not be able to make that decision.발음듣기
대기중
But if you have a smaller, more limited group limited participation, maybe they can make these decisions a little bit clearer, but what are the negatives here?발음듣기
대기중
If it's all about the elites, maybe they do a good job at truly representing the interests of the people but maybe they are good at representing the interests of the elite.발음듣기
대기중
Is this a democracy where the people are sovereign where the people rule, or is this an oligarchy where only a few people rule and they rule in their own interests?발음듣기
대기중
Think about, in the United States or whatever country you're watching from what elements of a participatory democracy do you see?발음듣기
대기중
And as we'll see in other videos these dimensions of democracy were vigorously debated by the Founding Fathers when they thought about whether to ratify the Constitution.발음듣기
대기중
We'll see this debate when we look at the Anti-Federalist Papers, especially we'll look closely at Brutus number one.발음듣기
대기중
We'll see this debate when we look at the Federalist Papers especially Federalist number 10, written by James Madison.발음듣기
대기중
칸아카데미 더보기더 보기
-
Manet, Le déjeuner sur l'herbe (Luncheon on t...
59문장 0%번역 좋아요0
번역하기 -
76문장 0%번역 좋아요2
번역하기 -
Pollock, "One: Number 31, 1950"
22문장 0%번역 좋아요0
번역하기 -
77문장 0%번역 좋아요2
번역하기
